![]() Is about the only thing in Autocad that can make use of multiple processorĬores. Which is usually pretty easy to find online, though you may have to dig aīit to get the specific model you're looking at. Read, unless the benchmarks for one is considerably higher than another, I'm used to itīrand to brand alone isn't going to matter TOOOOOoooo much, from what I've Employers will receive an assessment or tax rate for which they have to pay. I have a 3ghz P4 at work and an Intel Dual Core 1.8ghz at home, and myġ.8ghz blows away the P4, and am quite happy with it. Each state has a range of SUTA tax rates ranging from (0.65 to 6.8). AMD Phenom X4 9500 - Phenom X4 Agena Quad-Core 2.2 GHz Socket AM2+ 95W Desktop Processor - HD9500WCJ4BGD. Wrote in message most efficient for rendering?īut seriously, if you think it is slow on a dual core 2.2ghz, then you're aīit spoiled, or not too experienced with demanding rendering engines. General parameters AMD Phenom X4 9500: processor specifications, processor cache and memory, compatibility, peripherals, embedded modules, performance AMD Phenom X4 9500 and other characteristics. ![]() At this time an Intel quad-core is a better buy for bang/buck in Although it is not all that it was cracked up toīe. True quad-core platforms and octa-core platforms with the Dual Socket Direct Connect (DSDC) Architecture can provide enthusiast-class features and performance, to enable our customers to deliver professional-grade results. but something to consider.ĪMD Phenom is quad-core. The AMD Phenom FX processors are designed for systems that offer extreme megatasking capabilities. This is rough idea, not specific numbers. Thus a 2.2ghz dual core would be slower than a 1.8ghz quad. I have tested 3d rendering on AMD dual 2.2Ghz, but. Thus, I hopefully want to hear the opinion of you, experts better than me, that the CPU AMD Phenom 9500 Agena 2.2GHz is good for working autocad 3d rendering. the dual core would be exactly 2 times as fast. AMD Phenom 9500 Agena 2.2GHz Hi Im beginner of autocad, i. iff I had a 3ghz processor, and a 3ghz dual core. Rendering is about the only thing in Autocad that can make use of multiple processor cores. AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core & AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 Dual Core Processor Gaming performance vs system requirement comparison. Like AMD's earlier AM2 processors, the Phenom. The cache breakdown is four blocks of 128KB L1 cache, four blocks of 512KB L2 cache, and 2MB of 元 cache. ![]() I'm used to it though.īrand to brand alone isn't going to matter TOOOOOoooo much, from what I've read, unless the benchmarks for one is considerably higher than another, which is usually pretty easy to find online, though you may have to dig a bit to get the specific model you're looking at. The AMD Phenom 9500 (Socket AM2+) uses the Agena core and has a stock frequency of 2.2GHz, 3.6GHz Hyper-Transport, and is built upon a 65nm process. I have a 3ghz P4 at work and an Intel Dual Core 1.8ghz at home, and my 1.8ghz blows away the P4, and am quite happy with it. That's the #1 thing.īut seriously, if you think it is slow on a dual core 2.2ghz, then you're a bit spoiled, or not too experienced with demanding rendering engines. Smart modeling and efficient setting setups. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |